Our review process
Every casino is examined through the same research path. We first identify the brand, domain, operator and published account rules. We then record the live welcome offer, cashier information, game catalogue and support routes. The final review separates information we can confirm from public records or the logged-in product from claims that remain operator advertising.
A large promotion does not create a high score by itself. The rating begins with practical questions: who runs the account, how clearly the terms are written, which method can return a withdrawal and what happens when the player needs help. This approach makes the review useful even after a headline bonus changes.
Sources we use
The operator website is the primary source for the current offer, cashier, game catalogue and account rules. Company and licence claims are checked against the relevant public record where one is available. Provider material is used for slot RTP, volatility, mechanics and maximum win. Reliable reporting and complaint records can provide additional context, but they do not replace the casino terms or regulator record.
Affiliate pages may help identify a brand or promotion that needs investigation. They are not treated as final proof of ownership, availability, payout speed or safety. When sources conflict, the review describes the conflict or uses the more cautious value instead of choosing the most attractive claim.
- Current casino terms, privacy notice, bonus rules and cashier pages
- Public company and regulator records for the exact operator or domain
- Official game-provider information for RTP and slot mechanics
- Logged-in lobby, support and account screens where access is available
- Dated enforcement, complaint or service information relevant to the brand
What we record during an account check
The account journey starts before the deposit. We record the required registration fields, currency choices, bonus selection and whether the withdrawal screen can be inspected in advance. The first payment uses a modest amount and a method held in the same name as the account. Deposit credit time, merchant reference and any conversion are recorded separately.
The game sample covers more than one category and provider. We check loading, search, rules, mobile controls and whether the displayed title matches the lobby listing. Support is asked a specific question whose answer can be compared with the cashier or terms. A small withdrawal then records verification, internal approval and payment delivery as separate stages.
| Test stage | Evidence recorded |
|---|---|
| Registration | Required fields, account currency, confirmation and time to open the account. |
| Deposit | Method, amount, bonus selection, credit time, reference and conversion. |
| Games | Named titles, provider labels, rules or RTP screen, loading and mobile controls. |
| Support | Question, first useful response, resolution and consistency with written terms. |
| Verification | Documents requested, secure submission route, review time and status. |
| Withdrawal | Method, amount, pending time, approval, delivery and total elapsed time. |
How the score is built
Five areas contribute to the rating: ownership and account information, bonus terms, payments and withdrawals, games and usability, and support. Each area is considered on a five-point scale. Missing information is not automatically treated as evidence of wrongdoing, but it cannot earn the same score as a clear and verifiable record.
Serious issues can outweigh attractive features. An unclear operator, contradictory licence claim, restrictive withdrawal rule or pattern of unresolved payment complaints can lower the result even when the casino has a large game library. Conversely, a modest bonus does not prevent a strong score when the terms and account journey are clear.
Updates, corrections and commercial independence
Casino terms can change without notice, so every page displays an update date and readers can report a changed figure through the contact page. A correction is made when the current source or account evidence supports it. Material changes to ownership, eligibility, bonus cost or withdrawals receive priority over cosmetic edits.
The site may receive a commission when a reader follows selected links. Commercial arrangements do not purchase a rating, guarantee inclusion or prevent a negative finding from being published. The editorial order is determined by the comparison criteria used on the page.
Frequently asked questions
Do you open accounts at every casino?+
Account checks are completed where registration, cashier access and regional eligibility allow the full journey to be assessed.
Do affiliate payments affect the rating?+
No. Commercial links may fund the site, but they do not purchase a score or editorial position.
What happens when two sources disagree?+
We use the primary current record where possible and describe the conflict or publish the more cautious supported value.
Can an operator request a correction?+
Yes. It should provide the exact page, disputed statement and a current source that can be checked independently.